does topaz ai gigapixel work in photoshop

Less cheesy and a glimpse into where A.I.

Should Photoshop get a shared credit line here? Not only did I use sky replacement but I have no idea who actually photographed the sky. Grand Canyon Photo Processed By Me Grand Canyon Photo With Photoshop Sky Replacement Tool. The emotional connection I might have had from seeing something that represents a real scene goes out the window once I realize that half of it was never actually there. Sure, that's technically true but as someone that also enjoys viewing photography, I feel that once you 'break the fourth wall' then the magic is lost. The common argument is that if you disclose then you can do whatever you want. If I start to sprinkle in automated composites then it makes all of my work become suspect if every third image features elements that weren't actually there in front of my camera. While I did consider purchasing Luminar AI to illustrate this blog post (maybe I'll update this eventually), the whole reason why I chose to be a photographer is to show people the interesting places and things that I saw with my own eyes. I personally have no interest at all in creating nor marketing work such as this. While these techniques have been employed by real estate photographers for years, landscape and nature photography has historically been rooted more in capturing natural history than manufacturing scenes that didn't actually exist. On one side of this technology, Adobe Photoshop and especially Skylum's Luminar AI have been heavily promoting the ability to do automated sky replacements, adding in fog effects and sky effects such as god beams. One of the most polarizing topics in landscape photography these days is the use of artificial intelligence (A.I.) in post-processing software.

Does topaz ai gigapixel work in photoshop